Casino

Scope
UX Research, Product Design

For my Designlab Website Redesign capstone, I gave a fresh look to the website for a local eatery, Casino. After diving into Yelp reviews and conducting a usability study, I discovered some big challenges—52% of users didn’t even realize Casino was a restaurant, and only 16% could find how to book private events. So, I focused on making the landing page more inviting and simplifying the event booking process. The results were fantastic—a 44% increase in users recognizing Casino as a restaurant and a wonderful 67.7% boost in successful event bookings!

Year
2023

Tools
Figma, TL;DV, Dovetail , Maze, Whimsical

Tucked away on a quaint street in the heart of New York City's Chinatown lies the stylish and sophisticated eatery Casino. Drawing inspiration from Southern European cuisine, this must-visit spot boasts a menu filled with innovative dishes, cutting-edge interior design, and chic cocktail offerings, making it a fixture of the Lower East Side's dining landscape. 

Before delving into website redesign decisions, I made sure to thoroughly understand Casino as both a business and a brand, especially in comparison to other restaurants in Lower Manhattan. I wanted insights into various aspects, such as the dine-in experience, online versus physical experience, customer sentiment, design influences, and industry best practices. This involved analyzing customer reviews, recent press, industry trends, and competitor websites.

Early heuristic evaluations offered valuable insights into usability issues, which then guided improvements and formed testable hypotheses for initial usability testing.

From this evaluation, I developed two hypotheses: users might struggle to identify Casino as a restaurant from the homepage alone, and unclear page names and call-to-action buttons could hinder business goals. I also wanted to gather user feedback, focusing on reasons for visiting the website, impressions of the current site, and users' likes and dislikes.

The preliminary usability test revealed significant issues, including challenges with booking private events and difficulty recognizing Casino as a restaurant from the homepage. Although users liked the design's simplicity, they expressed dissatisfaction with organization, navigation, and the amount of business-related information. These findings strongly indicate that the current website design is hindering business objectives.

The main goal of the website redesign was to make sure it was easy and enjoyable for users while staying true to Casino's brand and usability standards. I added new sections like press highlights, private events, and a direct link to the restaurant's Resy page, and updated the sitemap accordingly.

During the initial review, I noticed a logo inconsistency on the website, so I decided to stick with one that matched the company's physical branding to keep things cohesive.

When updating the user interface, I followed Casino's design guidelines to ensure a smooth transition for users. I used Google Chrome's inspect tool to match fonts and colors accurately.

After finalizing the sitemap, I started with rough sketches to plan out the website's layout. I experimented with different ideas by moving around paper cutouts of common features. Once I had some options, I moved to digital wireframes in Figma to add more detail. When everything looked good, I created a polished prototype for testing and client presentation.

In this final round of testing, my goal was to see how well the redesigned website worked for users. I wanted to know if they could easily complete tasks, how they felt about the site, and if they had any suggestions for improvement. To compare with earlier tests, I asked users about their first impressions, booking experiences, and overall thoughts.

The unmoderated usability study revealed some big improvements from the initial test. Initially, only about half of the testers correctly identified Casino as a restaurant. However, in the recent study, most users got it right, which shows that the homepage changes were successful. Also, compared to before, users had a better experience with the new information architecture.

Overall, users liked the redesigned website better than the old one, which suggests that the changes were successful.✿